In recent months the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and other international papers have published articles about the Campaign for Conservative Democracy. The following article was printed on the Christian Science Monitor of Boston web site on July 22nd 2019:
A Tory tea party? How fringe voters are
reshaping British politics
·
GERRARDS CROSS, ENGLAND
A quarter-century of agitating at the
grassroots of Britain’s oldest and most successful political party has taught
John Strafford a few tricks.
Meet regularly but not too often.
Budget modestly: Rent a cheap space and serve a simple lunch. And always pack a
spare kettle for endless cups of tea, just in case.
On a recent Saturday morning, Mr.
Strafford, a retired accountant and entrepreneur, set out four rows of chairs
in a small church hall in this leafy London suburb of million-dollar houses and
stalwart votes for the Conservative Party, of which Mr. Strafford is a lifelong
member. His small group of party activists was gathering to discuss, among
other matters, a national leadership contest: It is widely assumed the winner
will be Boris Johnson, who is set to replace Prime Minister Theresa May on
Wednesday.
But Mr. Strafford and his allies are
not content with merely voting for their next leader. They want a much greater
say going forward in how the party is run and who stands for office,
particularly in safe seats in the heartland for the Tories, a center-right
party which has its roots in a 17th-century parliamentary faction and styles
itself as the natural party of government. And when it comes to the defining
issue of Brexit, that means purging Conservative members of Parliament who stand
in the way of a hard break from Europe.
Mr. Strafford describes a long war of
attrition between the party establishment and its corporate donors, and
activists in towns and suburbs like this one. “Brexit brought it to a head. It
was going to implode at some point,” he says.
That tension between the Tory base
and the elite has echoes of the tea party revolt a decade ago that reshaped the
GOP and blazed a path for Donald Trump’s presidency. Here, as in the U.S., the
revolt is as much about culture and identity as it is about economic policy.
And in Mr. Johnson, an Eton-educated populist who became the face of Brexit in
the 2016 referendum, it may have found its man, a bridge between a
Brexit-at-all-costs base and a flailing party establishment.
Crucially, Mr. Johnson is also seen
as a vote-getter who can take on Labour, the party’s traditional left-wing foe,
and the upstart Brexit Party that is snapping at its right flank. In May, the
Brexit Party polled first in largely symbolic European Parliament elections;
the Conservatives finished fifth.
For Jon Stanley, a fellow at the Bow
Group, a right-wing think tank in London, the Conservatives have no choice but
to embrace Brexit and stop trying to hold Remain voters.
“These two groups are now permanently
aligned and if the Tories don’t choose the obvious group, which is the Leavers,
it will be in trouble really, really fast,” he says.
“Do or die”
Around 160,000 Conservatives were
eligible to vote in the month long run-off race between Mr. Johnson, a former
foreign secretary and London mayor, and Jeremy Hunt, the current foreign
secretary. Ms. May agreed to step down in May after failing to take the United
Kingdom out of the European Union in March and being forced to negotiate a
Brexit extension until Oct. 31.
Mr. Johnson has vowed that the U.K.
will leave the EU on that date “do or die,” and embraced a no-deal Brexit in
the event that the EU refuses, as it has done until now, to amend his
predecessor’s contentious withdrawal agreement. Ms. May’s own government
forecasts that a “hard Brexit” is likely to trigger a deep recession; many U.K.
businesses have repeatedly urged Conservative leaders to abandon the threat.
But polling suggests that
Conservative members, who are older, whiter, and less urban than the broad
electorate, support a hard Brexit. Mr. Strafford says any economic setbacks,
even a drop in living standards, would be justified by the freedom and liberty
that a clean break from Europe affords. “This is a gut feeling among the
British public,” he says.
This feeling is not shared, however,
by Dominic Grieve, a former attorney general who since 1997 has represented the
Beaconsfield constituency – in which Gerrards Cross lies – and has threatened
to bring down any Conservative government that pursues a no-deal exit. Which is
why Mr. Strafford and other disgruntled local members are trying to stop Mr.
Grieve standing again as their candidate. He is one of several pro-Europe Tory
members of Parliament, including current and former ministers, facing de-selection
campaigns, though few have been as outspoken on Brexit as Mr. Grieve.
At the church hall meeting, Mr. Strafford provides an update on their
campaign and how they can keep up the pressure. “It’s critically important that
we win this battle so that the voice of members is heard,” he says.
U.K. parties don’t hold primaries and
the process of deselecting a sitting MP is complex. In the case of Mr. Grieve,
who lost a no-confidence vote in March, the Beaconsfield Conservative
association has asked him to reapply to stand in the next general election.
Still, warns Mr. Strafford, that mechanism probably won’t work in time for a
snap election.
Asked by a Monitor correspondent for
a show of hands as to who would vote for Mr. Grieve as their candidate in such
a scenario, none go up.
Older and whiter
In seats like Beaconsfield, a drop in
the Conservative vote may not sink the party. But the rise of the Brexit Party,
perhaps the closest analogue to the tea party, could prove disastrous for any
Conservative leader trying to win a fresh mandate, particularly if Brexit is
unfulfilled, as was shown in May when droves of Conservatives defected in the
European parliamentary election.
“If we don’t come out they’ll stay
with the Brexit Party, and then the Tory party becomes a rump,” warns Mr.
Strafford.
Allies of Mr. Johnson have suggested
that he could strike a one-off electoral pact with the Brexit Party in order to
avoid splitting the anti-EU vote, as happened in a by-election in Peterborough
in June that Labour held, despite only polling one-third of ballots cast.
Such a strategy is risky, though,
since it would jettison moderate Conservative votes, say analysts. And it
doubles down on the ideology of a base that is out of step with modern Britain
in its preference for a no-compromise Brexit even if it wrecks the party and its brand.
Rory Stewart, a Conservative minister
who ran as a centrist in the leadership race and failed to make the run-off,
said in April that if the party advocates for a no-deal Brexit, “we’re saying goodbye to young people,
goodbye to Remain voters, and goodbye to the center ground of British
politics.”
Ahead of the leadership race the
party’s membership has grown, but at 160,000 is a fraction of its post-war
peak. As recently as 1970, it represented over 3% of the electorate and
Conservative social clubs and events were a mainstay of town life. Now it is
less than 0.4% of Britons.
The raw numbers may be less important
than demographics; Conservative activists skew older and whiter, while their
fervor for Brexit is failing to win over the next generation of voters.
“They’re increasingly locked out of
urban Britain, which is younger and more multicultural,” says Tim Bale, a
professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London who has surveyed the
party’s membership.
He points out that an aging Tory base
in prosperous towns finds it easier to dismiss as fear-mongering the forecasts
of a no-deal Brexit recession. “They’ve got their house. They’ve got their
pension. The state of the economy isn’t so much of a worry for them,” he says.
Maureen Holding, a Conservative
councillor in the New Forest in southern England, says Mr. Johnson is the right
leader for the party as he can speak to younger voters. Just as important, says
Ms. Holding, who defended her seat in a May council election that saw a surge
in votes for the pro-EU Liberal Democrats, he’s committed to leaving the EU on
Oct. 31.
Asked about the economic disruption
of such an act, Ms. Holding raises her chin. “We are Great Britain,” she says.
