In the circumstances the Party Review should be put on hold so that a much more fundamental review can be carried out.
On 22nd April I wrote to Lord Feldman about the review a follows:
The Rt. Hon. The Lord Feldman of Elstree,
Chairman, The Conservative Party,4 Matthew Parker Street,
London,
SW1H 9HQ
Dear Lord Feldman,
Party
Review
At
a meeting of the Campaign for Conservative Democracy held on 16th
April the Party Review was discussed at some length. I was asked to put the following questions
to you:
1) Some of the changes proposed
will require alterations to the Party’s Constitution. Will the changes be made in accordance with
the Constitution or will some other process be adopted?
2) Will there be any point in
the process when ordinary members can propose amendments to any changes
proposed or propose changes in their own right?
3) The Review states on page
17: “The Membership Department, in consultation with senior volunteers will be
able to award a finite number of Gold memberships to activists who have given
outstanding service to the Party…….”
Will these awards be for life or for a finite period?
4) Regarding an Association
opting out from a proposed MCA (Multi Constituency Association) is there any
Constituency Association in the country which currently fulfils all the
functions outlined in Appendix 1?
5) What is the proposed
democratic structure of the proposed MCAs? Will the Officers be elected by all
the members of the Constituencies comprising the MCA?
6) Will the full time
professional in each MCA be employed by the MCA or by Conservative Central
Office? Will the campaign manager be
accountable to the Officers/members of the MCA or to Conservative Central
Office?
7) Who and by what process will
the delegates? to the National
Convention be decided by the MCA (page 39)?
8) How are “small” changes to
the Party Constitution to be made and how is “small” defined (page37)?
One final
point: the Spring National Convention is normally the meeting at which Officers
of the Convention are elected. This did
not happen this year so unless there is an early meeting of the Convention there
will be a clear breach of the Party Constitution. What is the position on this?
I
look forward to hearing from you.
Yours faithfully
John E. Strafford
So, once again questions unanswered. Just pushes them into the long grass. Another exaample of contempt for the grass roots!
No comments:
Post a Comment