The following speech was given by Don Porter on October 2nd at a fringe meeting at the Tory Party conference in Manchester Town Hall:
I am here today as someone who has
given 48 years of my life to the Party.
Starting as a branch treasurer in Macclesfield, rising to National
Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Board.
I have continued to work tirelessly for our Party co-founding Conservative
Voice five years ago. This is not a disruptive
organisation. I am not here today to
disrupt. It is in this spirit of service
and loyalty that I am here today.
Let me at the outset declare my 100%
support and loyalty to our Leader and Prime Minister. When I chaired the Party Conference in
Blackpool in 2002, Theresa May was Party Chairman. I worked very closely with her and saw at first-hand
her many qualities of hard work, commitment and saw her totally principled
approach to all issues of the day. It is
time for the team to work together to help her win with the challenges that lie
ahead.
BUT: It is
because I want to see her remain in Downing Street and not be replaced by
Jeremy Corbyn that I strongly believe that the organisation around her is not
fit for purpose and has to change. Our
leader deserves a far superior organisation.
We have to reverse the erosion of
engagement in our Party. Members and
activists feel undervalued, ignored and under-utilised. It is ironic that after years of privatising
industry, pushing down decision-making within the NHS, creating free schools
and giving parents choice and strongly supporting elected mayors that this
engagement never extended to the running of our own Party. We run the Party in a command and control style. Trusting the electorate to make decisions
locally must be matched by trusting our members to have a greater say in the running
of our Party.
It is 30 years since we won a General
Election with a real working majority.
Yet, we have continued to behave and organise as if our election machine
and structure is the gold standard of campaigning. Can you imagine if we were shareholders in a
listed company where the dividend and share price had been going down for some
time that those shareholders would have just passively observed the
deterioration?
Real engagement is essential: I still remember with pride many years ago, as Constituency
Chairman in Woking, being chosen to propose a Conference motion. The Constituency spent weeks engaged in
discussing motions for submission. You saw
them printed in the handbook. You reported
back after Conference on the reaction to the session. This all made it worthwhile. There was real interest and ownership.
Modernisation
– During recent previous regimes, I never quite understood what this meant in
terms of benefit to the Party organisation or to its performance. One thing is certain, it is strange that it
did not include increasing the influence of activists or members or in
developing an external audience interested in politics. Those activists and members raise money for
both the National Party and keep the Party running year-round locally. It is a naïve belief that a Party can be run
entirely from the Centre.
What a tragedy when the Party
destroyed the high quality professional agents.
Throughout the Country, they were a force for stability and action in
the most difficult times.
In my view, the head office of any
organisation be it a business, charity or political party, is also there to
serve its internal customers. We are not there to be told what to do, when to
do it, when it suits the Party administration.
CCHQ should treat activists and indeed Members of Parliament, as their customers,
not its resource.
So, what are the priorities as far as
I’m concerned?
- We need an elected Chairman of
the Board of the Party. I think it is perfectly appropriate for the Leader
of the day to select their own Political Party Chairman but the Board of
the Party should be more about the future direction and strategy of the
Party. Over the 9 years that I
served on the Party Board, I worked with nine Party Chairmen. Many of those former Chairmen are
amongst my closest political friends.
But, no-one can make long term decisions with such frequent changes
- The members should have an
involvement in how the Party spends the money that we contribute to the
Party nationally. All too often, some
people choose to forget that we keep the Party running at a local level
which requires around £30 million each year.
- I fully support an AGM for the
whole Party with real powers of decision-making.
- The way that the candidates’
selection is undertaken needs to change radically and I look to an elected
Chairman of the Candidates’ Committee.
- All Board Committees should be
led by an elected volunteer.
- Membership should be made
meaningful. Why should anyone
contribute £25 only to have access to the occasional selection of
candidates?
- We should be looking for greater
autonomy for local associations, not to conform to what the Centre expects
us to deliver. On previous
occasions, I have suggested a franchise approach for the structure of the
Party. Branches and Associations
working and performing within a set of core parameters but with healthy local
autonomy.
- It would be good to return to a
robust and effective awards and recognition programme for all parts of our
Party to recognise achievement.
If we are THE Party of aspiration for
our Country then we should be the organisation providing aspirations for our
members and potential followers.
Trusting the electorate to make
decisions about local issues must be matched by trusting our members and
activists to have a greater say in the running of our Party.
Let me close by referring to quotes
from my work with organisations and businesses which I believe are relevant to
our Party from leading business people:
·
“The real dampener on engagement is
the soggy, cold blanket of centralised authority.”
·
“People want to know they matter and
they want to be treated as people.
That’s the new talent contract”.
·
“To win in the marketplace you must
first win in the workplace”.
Ladies and gentlemen, to win the next
election we must first and now win inside our own Party.
Yes, indeed.
ReplyDeleteSometimes we pay our £25 and are still not invited to vote! But I did receive a letter thanking me for voting (that is why I knew there had been an election of Officers in Wales).
Not good enough.
We undoubtedly need greater democracy in the party - otherwise why should people join? We must trust in the wisdom of most party members - we represent (or should represent) the Common Sense of the British people.
ReplyDelete