I would comment on the following article which appeared on the Conservativehome web site on 19th March 2018:
Paul, within minutes of the Party Chairman
announcing the figure at the Spring Forum the Chairman of the National
Convention said we didn't know what the National membership figure was. Both
are on the Party Board, don't they talk to each other?
Every Party Chairman for the last twenty years has
always told us that we have had so many people joining us in the last few
months. They never tell us how many we have lost.
A member paying a subscription on January 1st 2017
is still regarded as a Party member even if they have not paid this year,
because they have three months in which to renew their subscription. As most
members are on a calendar year subscription we will not know what the real
figure is until after April 1st.
Sadly at the Spring Forum there was not a single
suggestion put forward as to how we will attract new members. The test for the
party Chairman is will he give members more rights. The biggest applause on the
Friday of the Forum was the suggestion that we have genuine debates at the
Party conference with votes on them and for the debates to be transparent and
not behind closed doors.
One further point which should be borne in mind is this: there is always an upsurge in membership just before a General Election. The 124,000 figure will reflect this upsurge. Unfortunately after a General Election there is a decline and the decline has always been greater than the upsurge. This decline will not show until later this year when renewals of the new members comes up.
"Conservative Party Membership is 124,000" Discuss
by Paul Goodman
In 2013, this site saw
information that supported the membership figure then declared by the Conservative Party:
134,000. A year later, the Party said that this had risen to 149,800. Grant
Shapps drove the disclosure of both these figures. After he left CCHQ, it
clammed up again.
Brandon Lewis is too smart an
operator to believe that non-disclosure was sustainable, and over the weekend
he declared that membership currently stands at 124,000. Our last
guesstimate, made in September last year, was “around 100,000” – a figure that tallied with that of John Strafford.
So a 124,000 estimate sounds
plausible. But this assessment comes with qualifications.
First, it is only correct to say
that Party membership is roughly “twice the size originally thought”, as the Daily
Telegraph does today, if one accepts the original estimate
as being 70,000, the figure it cites (which we didn’t).
Second, any comparison of figures
may not be like-for-like. On the face of it, membership has fallen by
about 25,000 since 2014. But the caculation made now may not be made on
the same basis as that made then. The drop may be smaller. Or bigger.
Finally, there is the question of
how much information CCHQ actually holds – and how accurate it is. That
some Associations hold their membership numbers back is well known. That
some of the details will be out of date is surely incontestible.
So there are factors in play that
both inflate and depress that 124,000 figure.
Tim Bale, who co-runs the ESRC
Party Members Project, told this yesterday evening that “given the
crazy patchwork that is the party’s membership ‘system’, I cannot for the life
of me see how any number CCHQ comes up with can be taken as definitive. I
wouldn’t even trust the latest figure to give us an accurate idea of the trend
over time.”
Lewis said that 6000 new members
have joined since the Prime Minister’s December Brexit deal. One insider view
is that CCHQ has simply added these to a membership total for last year
(whatever that was), and that this figure will drift down again when
non-renewals are next taken into account. Full credit, though, to him for
getting a figure out there, and thereby enabling this discussion to take place.
No comments:
Post a Comment