We are possibly witnessing the greatest betrayal of
democracy in the history of the United Kingdom.
Democracy is the process by which you determine the
will of a majority of the people.
The will of a majority of the people was determined
in the referendum on the European Union in 2016. The people voted to leave.
One of the leaders of the greatest betrayal was
Dominic Grieve MP.
He stood for election in the General Election of
2017 on a Conservative manifesto that said we would leave the European
Union. That manifesto said we would
honour the decision of the people.
Dominic Grieve voted in favour of Article 50 of the
Withdrawal Agreement which gave a date for withdrawal from the European Union
of 29th March 2019.
Ever since, he has obstructed the implementation of
the will of the people.
He has called for a second referendum.
He has voted in favour of the revocation of Article
50.
He has colluded with Labour MPs to take on the
government of this nation.
And the reason he gives for these broken promises is
that he is speaking in the National Interest, but who is Dominic Grieve to
determine what is the National Interest?
Does he not accept that the 17.4 million people who voted to leave the
European Union were speaking in the National Interest?
In view of his actions I have no faith in Dominic
Grieve, I have no trust in him.
In view of his broken promises I cannot ever vote
for him again.
I call on Dominic Grieve MP not to stand as the
Conservative Parliamentary candidate for the Beaconsfield Constituency Conservative Association at the next General
Election and
I call on the Association to immediately start the
process of selecting a new parliamentary candidate for the constituency.
In the words of Oliver Cromwell: “You have sat too
long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done
with you. In the name of God, go!”
In the run up to the referendum, Grieve told British expats, living in EU countries, that they would become “illegal migrants” if the vote was for Leave. As a former Attorney General his words would have had some weight. But, as a lawyer, he ought tohave known that international law provided for acquired rights of residence in such cases.
ReplyDelete