Changes to the Conservative Party Constitution
– Parliamentary Candidates
Yesterday 27 October, Paul
Goodman wrote on the Conservativehome web site:
“We are trying to imagine
what Boris Johnson, in his buccaneering days as a Daily Telegraph columnist
and aspirant Conservative candidate, would have made of an e-mail telling him
that “we are moving away from the linear two-pass model and instead are
transitioning to a nine-box lattice model”. And that “this will provide a
much broader and flexible range of development paths”.
Our guess is that he would run for the hills. Or for his
word processor. Or both.
That may also be the instinct of members of the Conservative
candidates’ list, who as we write this piece, are receiving a note containing
those words.
The e-mail also refers to “a reimagined competency framework”
and ensuring “that our new platforms are populated with one source of truth”
and offering “a supportive and bespoke development journey for each one of
you”. So, what’s going on?”
One of the
things that is going on is a proposal that the Constitution of the Conservative
Party is to be changed. At present the
Party Board:
“ shall establish and maintain in
accordance with the provisions of Article 19.2 a Committee of the Board on
Candidates, (“The Committee on Candidates”} the composition and membership of
which shall be as the Board shall from time to time determine, but which shall be
chaired by a chairman (“the Chairman of the Committee on Candidates”) who shall
report directly to the Board.”
This is
proposed to be changed to:
“The
Chairman of the Committee on Candidates(sub Committee of the Board) shall be
nominated by the Chairman of the National Conservative Convention. Appointed by
the Board.”
In other
words, whereas currently any member of the Party Board could nominate the
Chairman of the Committee on Candidates, now only the Chairman of the National
Conservative Convention can do so. This
is a blatant naked power grab by the Chairman of the National Convention. One more reason why the National Convention
should be abolished.
The Chairman
of the Committee on Candidates should be elected by and accountable to all
Party members at an Annual General Meeting of the Party to which all Party
members are invited. At that AGM, The
Chairman of the Committee on Candidates should report on the state of the Candidates
List and answer any questions members may have.
Parliamentary candidates
should be selected by the local Constituency Association without interference
by CCHQ except in those cases where the membership of the Association is less
than 100
Without these
radical reforms we will continue to get the nonsense illustrated by Paul
Goodman above!
Spot on once again John.
ReplyDeleteOur non resident candidate and now MP was a done deal. Put in front of members and voted in 20 minutes later! 2 other candidates also non resident in the area.
There.should be fixed term GEs in May. Parliamentary.candidates should be selected simultaneously by postal ballot with Alternative Vote the previous January from shortlists consisting of anyone able to get a proposer and seconder from the local members. Send with each ballot paper a piece of paper containing a 200-word election address from each candidate.
ReplyDeleteGreat job for publishing such a beneficial web site. Your web log isn’t only useful but it is additionally really creative too. strippers near me
ReplyDelete